Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imfeld, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
10(3):405-419 (1999)     Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
© 1999 SAGE Publications


Reviews

Chewing Gum—Facts and Fiction: a Review of Gum-Chewing and Oral Health

T. Imfeld

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, School of Dentistry, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland

The world market for chewing gum is estimated to be 560,000 tons per year, representing approximately US $5 billion. Some 374 billion pieces of chewing gum are sold worldwide every year, representing 187 billion hours of gum-chewing if each piece of gum is chewed for 30 minutes. Chewing gum can thus be expected to have an influence on oral health. The labeling of sugar-substituted chewing gum as "safe for teeth" or "tooth-friendly" has been proven beneficial to the informed consumer. Such claims are allowed for products having been shown in vivo not to depress plaque pH below 5.7, neither during nor for 30 minutes after the consumption. However, various chewing gum manufacturers have recently begun to make distinct health promotion claims, suggesting, e.g., reparative action or substitution for mechanical hygiene. The aim of this critical review-covering the effects of the physical properties of chewing gum and those of different ingredients both of conventional and of functional chewing gum-is to provide a set of guidelines for the interpretation of such claims and to assist oral health care professionals in counseling patients.

Key Words: Chewing gum • saliva • plaque • caries • sugar substitutes • drug delivery.

Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 3, 405-419 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/10454411990100030901


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
P. Milgrom, K. A. Ly, O. K. Tut, L. Mancl, M. C. Roberts, K. Briand, and M. J. Gancio
Xylitol Pediatric Topical Oral Syrup to Prevent Dental Caries: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2009; 163(7): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
K. A. Ly, P. Milgrom, and M. Rothen
The Potential of Dental-Protective Chewing Gum in Oral Health Interventions
J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2008; 139(5): 553 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
P. Alanen
Does Chewing Explain the Caries-preventive Results with Xylitol?
Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2001; 80(7): 1600 - 1601.
[PDF]