This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Geurtsen, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF DENTAL CASTING ALLOYS

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical University Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany; geurtsenwerner{at}mh-hannover.de

Most cast dental restorations are made from alloys or commercially pure titanium (cpTi). Many orthodontic appliances are also fabricated from metallic materials. It has been documented in vitro and in vivo that metallic dental devices release metal ions, mainly due to corrosion. Those metallic components may be locally and systemically distributed and could play a role in the etiology of oral and systemic pathological conditions. The quality and quantity of the released cations depend upon the type of alloy and various corrosion parameters. No general correlation has been observed between alloy nobility and corrosion. However, it has been documented that some Ni-based alloys, such as beryllium-containing Ni alloys, exhibit increased corrosion, specifically at low pH. Further, microparticles are abraded from metallic restorations due to wear. In sufficient quantities, released metal ions—particularly Cu, Ni, Be, and abraded microparticles—can also induce inflammation of the adjacent periodontal tissues and the oral mucosa. While there is also some in vitro evidence that the immune response can be altered by various metal ions, the role of these ions in oral inflammatory diseases such as gingivitis and periodontitis is unknown. Allergic reactions due to metallic dental restorations have been documented. Ni has especially been identified as being highly allergenic. Interestingly, from 34% to 65.5% of the patients who are allergic to Ni are also allergic to Pd. Further, Pd allergy always occurrs with Ni sensitivity. In contrast, no study has been published which supports the hypothesis that dental metallic materials are mutagenic/genotoxic or might be a carcinogenic hazard to man. Taken together, very contradictory data have been documented regarding the local and systemic effects of dental casting alloys and metallic ions released from them. Therefore, it is of critical importance to elucidate the release of cations from metallic dental restorations in the oral environment and to determine the biological interactions of released metal components with oral and systemic tissues.

Key Words: Dental alloys • metals • corrosion • biocompatibility • allergy • occupational hazards

Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 1, 71-84 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/154411130201300108


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. J. Christensen Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Versus Zirconia-Based Ceramic Restorations, 2009 J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2009; 140(8): 1036 - 1039. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Geurtsen Toxicology of Dental Materials and 'Clinical Experience' Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2003; 82(7): 500 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF]