Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thyagarajan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
14(3):154-174 (2003)     Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
© 2003 International and American Associations for Dental Research

GENETICALLY ALTERED MOUSE MODELS: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY

Tamizchelvi Thyagarajan, Satish Totey*, Mary Jo S. Danton and Ashok B. Kulkarni**

Functional Genomics Unit and Gene Targeting Facility, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Building 30, Room 527, 30 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892;

Correspondence: **corresponding author, akulkarni{at}dir.nidcr.nih.gov


CONTROVERSY

This review of the current status of genetically altered mouse models highlights the daunting challenges of untangling complex genetic mechanisms underlying craniofacial development and disease. Although somewhat controversial, largely as a result of technical advances in manipulating the mouse genome, our understanding of craniofacial genetics has broadened substantially. Further advances will open up possibilities for therapeutic interventions by identifying new targets among the plethora of molecular modifiers.

— Olav Alvares, Editor

 

Targeted gene disruption in mice is a powerful tool for generating murine models for human development and disease. While the human genome program has helped to generate numerous candidate genes, few genes have been characterized for their precise in vivo functions. Gene targeting has had an enormous impact on our ability to delineate the functional roles of these genes. Many gene knockout mouse models faithfully mimic the phenotypes of the human diseases. Because some models display an unexpected or no phenotype, controversy has arisen about the value of gene-targeting strategies. We argue in favor of gene-targeting strategies, provided they are used with caution, particularly in interpreting phenotypes in craniofacial and oral biology, where many genes have pleiotropic roles. The potential pitfalls are outweighed by the unique opportunities for developing and testing different therapeutic strategies before they are introduced into the clinic. In the future, we believe that genetically engineered animal models will be indispensable for gaining important insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying development, as well as disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

Key Words: Craniofacial development • growth factors • hereditary disease • knockout mice • teeth • transgenic mice

Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 3, 154-174 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/154411130301400302
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
J. Pi, Y. Bai, K. W. Daniel, D. Liu, O. Lyght, D. Edelstein, M. Brownlee, B. E. Corkey, and S. Collins
Persistent Oxidative Stress Due to Absence of Uncoupling Protein 2 Associated with Impaired Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Function
Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3040 - 3048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
L. Yu, S. Gu, S. Alappat, Y. Song, M. Yan, X. Zhang, G. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, et al.
Shox2-deficient mice exhibit a rare type of incomplete clefting of the secondary palate
Development, October 1, 2005; 132(19): 4397 - 4406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JDRHome page
P. Kang and K.K.H. Svoboda
Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transformation during Craniofacial Development
Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 2005; 84(8): 678 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
Y. Lan, C. E. Ovitt, E.-S. Cho, K. M. Maltby, Q. Wang, and R. Jiang
Odd-skipped related 2 (Osr2) encodes a key intrinsic regulator of secondary palate growth and morphogenesis
Development, July 1, 2004; 131(13): 3207 - 3216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
S. Gupta, V. M. Adhami, M. Subbarayan, G. T. MacLennan, J. S. Lewin, U. O. Hafeli, P. Fu, and H. Mukhtar
Suppression of Prostate Carcinogenesis by Dietary Supplementation of Celecoxib in Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of the Mouse Prostate Model
Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3334 - 3343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]