|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
CONTROVERSIES IN ENDODONTICS
G. Bergenholtz*
Department of Endodontology and Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Box 40530, Göteborg, Sweden;
L. Spångberg
Department of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Graphic representation of the findings in the study by Hörsted et al. (1985). While the overall rate of pulpal survival was high, there was a decline over time. Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
|
|
View larger version (243K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Tissue specimen demonstrating hard tissue repair in the apical portion of a root canal subsequent to pulpectomy and dressing with calcium hydroxide to close off residual non-inflamed pulp tissue (A). Also note extension of pulp tissue into a lateral canal (B). From Engström and Spångberg (1967).
|
|
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Tissue specimen of an extracted tooth with inflammatory tissue attached to the root tip. Extensive apical root resorption has destroyed original apical canal configuration. Courtesy of Dr. D. Ricucci.
|
|
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 2,
99-114 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154411130401500204
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
